Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology

Claimed cases: results

20 claimed cases found:

Your search returned 20 results in total.

CUREDI ID Question at stake Country Official Citation Date of decision Author
CUREDI041UK003 Whether members of a family involved in a blood feud in Albania form a “particular social group” under the Refugee Convention and whether internal relocation is possible for them. United Kingdom EH (blood feuds) Albania CG [2012] UKUT 00348 (IAC)
 2012-10-15 Iulia Mirzac; Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK016 Whether internal relocation was a viable alternative for the appellant, an asylum seeker from the Gambia who feared witchcraft persecution on the ground of religious beliefs. United Kingdom Ismaila Demba v SSHD [2015] UKUT 01405 (IAC)
 2015-08-25 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK013 1) Whether the Tribunal erred in law in rejecting as not credible the account of the appellant that he feared persecution by hands of a Sierran Leonian secret society after he escaped from them. 2) Whether the Tribunal erred in law in finding that the Appellant could reasonably live in his home town and shield himself from any form of danger. United Kingdom HK v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 1037
 2006-07-20 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK001 Whether the discrimination faced by an albino child in Nigeria could amount to persecution. United Kingdom JA (child – risk of persecution) Nigeria [2016] UKUT 00560 (IAC)
 2016-11-24 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK003 Whether, firstly, the First Tier Tribunal erred in law when it found that it would be unduly harsh for the applicant to relocate elsewhere in Nigeria, and secondly, whether the Upper Tribunal erred when it ruled that the First Tier Tribunal had found that the risk of persecution to the claimant existed throughout Nigeria. United Kingdom Oco v A Decision of The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) [2012] CSIH 65
 2012-07-26 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK005 Whether the adjudicator was correct to grant refugee status to the respondent based on the finding that (1) the respondent was at risk of persecution due to his religious beliefs, and (2) the evidence presented supported the claim that the risk of persecution would be greater upon his return to Cameroon. United Kingdom Secretary of State for the Home Department v Meli [2002] UKIAT 06977
 2003-03-03 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK006 Whether, under the Refugee Convention, women and girls from Ethiopia constitute a particular social group (PSG) and, if they do, whether relocation to another part of Ethiopia should be seen as a feasible option for them to pursue if seeking refuge. United Kingdom RG (Ethiopia) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 339
 2006-04-04 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK004 Whether adequate reasons were provided by tribunals when offering their conclusion that the appellant had failed to demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution under the Refugee Convention on the grounds of (a) her illegal exit from Iran, (b) her membership in a social group (that of women suffering domestic violence), and (c) her conversion to Christianity. United Kingdom AS (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] ECWA 1539
 2017-10-12 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK009 Whether the acts of the persecutor were connected to the appellant’s religion, in a way consistent with the grounds for persecution recognised under the Refugee Convention, and what is the meaning of the word “religion” under the Refugee Convention? United Kingdom Omoruyi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2000] ECWA Civ 258
 2000-10-12 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK017 Whether the claimant, who was a Turkish woman facing a non-consensual arranged marriage, and who feared persecution at the hands of their family on their discovery that she had breached social norms mandating pre-marital virginity, was, therefore, qualified for protection under the Refugee Convention. United Kingdom SSHD v YK (PSG - Women) Turkey CG [2002] UKIAT 05491
 2002-10-28 Katia Bianchini; Libby Johnston View
CUREDI041UK002 Whether “former victims of trafficking” and “former victims of trafficking for sexual exploitation” can be members of a “particular social group” (PSG) under the Refugee Convention. Whether the appellant is at risk of persecution in Moldova based on membership in such a group. United Kingdom SB (PSG – Protection Regulations – Reg 6) Moldova CG [2008] UKAIT 00002
 2007-04-26 Iulia Mirzac; Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK011 Whether the Territorial Commissions for the Recognition of International Protection was correct to refuse the appellant’s application for humanitarian protection on the ground that the risk of harm for fear of witchcraft was implausible. Italy Civil Court of Bologna, Order of 09 October 2017, G.R. 17524/2016 (Tribunale di Bologna, Ordinanza del 09/10/2017, G.R. 17524/2016)
 2017-10-09 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK012 Whether it was correct for the Secretary of State to certify the claimant’s asylum claim as clearly unfounded on the grounds that (1) the state of origin would afford the claimant sufficient protection; and (2) internal relocation was possible. United Kingdom Obasi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWHC 381 (Admin)
 2007-02-17 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK007 Whether the continued inclusion of Pakistan on a “White List” of countries considered to be safe countries for asylum purposes is justified. United Kingdom Secretary Of State For Home Department (SSHD) v Javed and Others [2001] EWCA Civ 789
 2001-05-17 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK008 Whether members of the Ahmadi sect could be at risk of religion-based persecution in Pakistan, and whether specific appellants would face persecution in Pakistan as a result of their affiliation to the Ahmadi sect. United Kingdom MN and Others (Ahmadis – Country Conditions – Risk) Pakistan CG [2012] UKUT 00389 (IAC)
 2012-11-13 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK010 Was it correct for the adjudicator to grant asylum to BL, the respondent, due to his fear of being persecuted for his refusal to join the Aro cult? In particular, (1) did the persecution fall within one of the Refugee Convention grounds (i.e., political opinion, race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group)? (2) was internal protection possible for BL? (3) was internal relocation possible for BL? United Kingdom BL (Ogboni Cult – Protection – Relocation) Nigeria CG [2002] UKIAT 01708
 2007-02-17 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK018 Whether Bidoon are at real risk of persecution in Kuwait; whether there is a disparity in the way documented and undocumented Bidoon are treated; and which key document forms the basis of such a distinction. United Kingdom NM (documented/undocumented Bidoon: risk) Kuwait CG [2013] UKUT 00356 (IAC)
 2013-01-30 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK021 Whether the First-tier Tribunal's decision was affected by procedural unfairness as a result of (1) refusing to adjourn the hearing due to issues with the accuracy of the interpretation at the hearing and (2) failing to take into account post-hearing evidence; and (3) whether the First-tier Tribunal's decision was affected by an error of law as far as the assessment of the appellant's evidence was concerned. United Kingdom TS (interpreters) Eritrea [2019] UKUT 00352 (IAC)
 2019-08-20 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK002 1) Whether Christians in Pakistan face serious discrimination that amounts to persecution under the Refugee Convention or the ECHR. 2) What risk that Evangelical Christians face in Pakistan. 3) What particular discrimination Christian women face in Pakistan. United Kingdom AK and SK (Christians: risk) Pakistan CG [2014] UKUT 00569 (IAC)
 2014-12-15 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK020 Whether the first-tier judge erred in law when he declined to allow the interpreter to give “evidence” in court concerning the language spoken by the appellant. United Kingdom Mohamed (role of interpreter) Somalia [2011] UKUT 337 (IAC)
 2011-07-21 Katia Bianchini View

New search Refine search