Results
7 case reports found:
Your search returned 7 results in total.
| CUREDI ID | Question at stake | Country | Official Citation | Date of decision | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUREDI101TR003 | Whether the applicant’s repeated convictions for refusing military service on conscientious grounds, and the treatment to which he was subjected, constituted a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). | Turkey | Ülke v. Turkey, App. no. 39437/98, 24 January 2006
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0124JUD003943798
|
2006-10-24 | Ahmet Said Aydil |
View |
| CUREDI101TR006 | Whether statements made in a television broadcast criticizing democracy and secularism, calling for the establishment of a sharia-based order, and describing children born of civil marriages as illegitimate are protected by freedom of expression. | Turkey | Gündüz v. Turkey, App. no. 35071/97, judgment of 4 December 2003
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1204JUD003507197
|
2003-12-04 | Ahmet Said Aydil |
View |
| CUREDI101TR007 | Whether a ban on a university professor wearing the Islamic headscarf while performing her professional duties, and her being deemed to have resigned for continuing to wear it, violated her freedom of religion and constituted discrimination. | Turkey | Kurtulmuş v. Turkey, App. no. 65500/01, 24 January 2006
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0124DEC006550001
|
2006-01-24 | Ahmet Said Aydil |
View |
| CUREDI101TR008 | Whether the dissolution of Refah Partisi for its alleged secret efforts to establish sharia law within a plurality of legal systems was justified and compatible with Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). | Turkey | Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey, App. nos. 41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98, and 41344/98, 13 February 2003
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0213JUD004134098
|
2003-02-13 | Ahmet Said Aydil |
View |
| CUREDI101TR009 | Whether a military officer’s compulsory retirement for conduct deemed incompatible with military discipline and laiklik (secularism) violated his right to religious freedom under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. | Turkey | Kalaç v. Turkey, App. no. 20704/92, 1 July 1997
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0701JUD002070492
|
1997-07-01 | Ahmet Said Aydil |
View |
| CUREDI101TR010 | Whether the Turkish authorities’ enforcement of a school dress code, and the resulting restriction on the applicants’ access to education arising from the ban on Islamic headscarves, violated the applicants’ rights under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). | Turkey | Köse and Others v. Turkey, App. no. 26625/02, 24 January 2006
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0124DEC002662502
|
2006-01-24 | Ahmet Said Aydil |
View |
| CUREDI101TR013 | 1) Whether a ban on wearing the Islamic headscarf at universities constitutes a justified interference with the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and whether such a restriction can be deemed necessary in a democratic society for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others and the maintenance of public order, laiklik (secularism), and gender equality. 2) Whether a university rector’s circular (genelge) satisfies the requirement that restrictions on rights be prescribed by law. | Turkey | Leyla Şahin v. Turkey, App. no. 44774/98, 10 November 2005
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1110JUD004477498
|
2005-11-10 | Ahmet Said Aydil |
View |