Claimed cases: results
8 claimed cases found:
Your search returned 8 results in total.
| CUREDI ID | Question at stake | Country | Official Citation | Date of decision | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUREDI033DE009 | Whether a traditional religious marriage in Turkey (Imam marriage) fulfills the requirements of a marriage within the meaning of section 237 German Penal Code. | Germany | Regional Court Kaiserslautern, Judgment of 26 January 2017, 6042 Js 217/13 – 4 KLs (LG Kaiserslautern, Urteil vom 26.01.2017, 6042 Js 217/13 – 4 KLs)
ECLI:DE:LGKAISE:2017:0126.6042JS217.134KLS.0A
|
2017-01-26 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
| CUREDI041UK014 | 1) Whether “women in the Ivory Coast” form a particular social group (PSG) under the Refugee Convention. 2) Whether the appellant– a Muslim woman with an illegitimate child and a victim of female genital mutilation (FGM), forced marriage, and domestic violence – would upon return to the Ivory Coast face a real risk of persecution under the Refugee Convention or treatment contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). 3) Whether the removal of the appellant and her child from the UK would be in breach of their rights under Article 8 of the ECHR, and 4) Whether sufficient protection and internal relocation would be available for them within the Ivory Coast. | United Kingdom | MD (Women) Ivory Coast v SSHD CG [2010] UKUT 215 (IAC) |
2010-07-07 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI013UK017 | Whether the claimant, who was a Turkish woman facing a non-consensual arranged marriage, and who feared persecution at the hands of their family on their discovery that she had breached social norms mandating pre-marital virginity, was, therefore, qualified for protection under the Refugee Convention. | United Kingdom | SSHD v YK (PSG - Women) Turkey CG [2002] UKIAT 05491 |
2002-10-28 | Katia Bianchini; Libby Johnston |
View |
| CUREDI041UK015 | 1. Whether women in Afghanistan can form a “particular social group” (PSG) under the 1951 Refugee Convention. 2. Whether the appellant, a woman without a male family member or tribal support, would face a real risk of persecution under the Refugee Convention upon return to Afghanistan. 3. Whether internal relocation is possible for them. | United Kingdom | NS (Social Group – Women - Forced Marriage) Afghanistan CG [2004] UKIAT 00328 |
2004-12-30 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK020 | 1) Whether the Family Court has jurisdiction to make a Forced Marriage Protection Order (FMPO*) where the person requiring protection is an adult with mental capacity to make relevant decisions and opposing the FMPO, and whether an indefinite ‘passport order’ could be made as part of the FMPO. 2) What approach shall the Family Court take when balancing the right to be protected under Article 3 and right to private and family life under Article 8 of the ECHR. | United Kingdom | Re K (Forced Marriage: Passport Order) 2020 EWCA Civ 190 |
2020-02-21 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK021 | Whether the petitioner was forced to enter into an arranged marriage and whether the marriage should be declared voidable on the ground of duress. | United Kingdom | NS v MI [2006] EWHC 1646 (Fam) |
2006-07-05 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK022 | What powers do the courts of England and Wales have concerning mentally-able adults at risk of forced marriage and how should those powers be exercised? | United Kingdom | RE SK (An Adult) (Forced Marriage: Approproate Relief) [2004] EWHC 3202 (Fam) |
2004-12-10 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK023 | Whether it fell within the court’s jurisdiction to make a minor with both Pakistani and British nationality a ward of court to enable her to travel to the UK from Pakistan, where she was believed to be at risk of being forced into a marriage. | United Kingdom | RB v FB and MA (Forced Marriage: Wardship: Jurisdiction) [2008] EWHC 1436 (Fam) |
2008-04-15 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |