Claimed cases: results
9 claimed cases found:
Your search returned 9 results in total.
| CUREDI ID | Question at stake | Country | Official Citation | Date of decision | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUREDI013UK003 | Whether, firstly, the First Tier Tribunal erred in law when it found that it would be unduly harsh for the applicant to relocate elsewhere in Nigeria, and secondly, whether the Upper Tribunal erred when it ruled that the First Tier Tribunal had found that the risk of persecution to the claimant existed throughout Nigeria. | United Kingdom | Oco v A Decision of The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) [2012] CSIH 65 |
2012-07-26 | Katia Bianchini |
View |
| CUREDI013UK006 | Whether, under the Refugee Convention, women and girls from Ethiopia constitute a particular social group (PSG) and, if they do, whether relocation to another part of Ethiopia should be seen as a feasible option for them to pursue if seeking refuge. | United Kingdom | RG (Ethiopia) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 339 |
2006-04-04 | Katia Bianchini |
View |
| CUREDI041UK006 | 1. Whether intact females in The Gambia face a real risk of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and whether internal relocation is available to them. 2. Whether parental opposition to FGM is sufficient to prevent a female from The Gambia from being subjected to FGM when the extended family practices it. | United Kingdom | K and Others (FGM) The Gambia CG [2013] UKUT 00062 |
2016-10-13 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK011 | Whether the appellant, an unmarried woman with an illegitimate mixed-race child, would face upon return to Azerbaijan a real risk of persecution under the Refugee Convention or treatment contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). | United Kingdom | SL (Unmarried Mother with Mixed Race Child) Azerbaijan CG [2013] UKUT 00046 (IAC) |
2013-02-13 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK012 | 1) Whether the appellant, a divorced woman with an illegitimate child previously subjected to domestic violence, would upon return to Bangladesh face a real risk of persecution under the Refugee Convention or treatment contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), 2) Whether removing the appellant from the UK would be in breach of her and her first child’s rights under Article 8 of the ECHR, and 3) Whether internal relocation would be possible for her and her second child. | United Kingdom | SA (Divorced Woman – Illegitimate child) Bangladesh CG [2011] UKUT 00254 (IAC) |
2011-07-11 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK014 | 1) Whether “women in the Ivory Coast” form a particular social group (PSG) under the Refugee Convention. 2) Whether the appellant– a Muslim woman with an illegitimate child and a victim of female genital mutilation (FGM), forced marriage, and domestic violence – would upon return to the Ivory Coast face a real risk of persecution under the Refugee Convention or treatment contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). 3) Whether the removal of the appellant and her child from the UK would be in breach of their rights under Article 8 of the ECHR, and 4) Whether sufficient protection and internal relocation would be available for them within the Ivory Coast. | United Kingdom | MD (Women) Ivory Coast v SSHD CG [2010] UKUT 215 (IAC) |
2010-07-07 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK002 | Whether “former victims of trafficking” and “former victims of trafficking for sexual exploitation” can be members of a “particular social group” (PSG) under the Refugee Convention. Whether the appellant is at risk of persecution in Moldova based on membership in such a group. | United Kingdom | SB (PSG – Protection Regulations – Reg 6) Moldova CG [2008] UKAIT 00002 |
2007-04-26 | Iulia Mirzac; Katia Bianchini |
View |
| CUREDI013UK017 | Whether the claimant, who was a Turkish woman facing a non-consensual arranged marriage, and who feared persecution at the hands of their family on their discovery that she had breached social norms mandating pre-marital virginity, was, therefore, qualified for protection under the Refugee Convention. | United Kingdom | SSHD v YK (PSG - Women) Turkey CG [2002] UKIAT 05491 |
2002-10-28 | Katia Bianchini; Libby Johnston |
View |
| CUREDI041UK015 | 1. Whether women in Afghanistan can form a “particular social group” (PSG) under the 1951 Refugee Convention. 2. Whether the appellant, a woman without a male family member or tribal support, would face a real risk of persecution under the Refugee Convention upon return to Afghanistan. 3. Whether internal relocation is possible for them. | United Kingdom | NS (Social Group – Women - Forced Marriage) Afghanistan CG [2004] UKIAT 00328 |
2004-12-30 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |