Claimed cases: results
11 claimed cases found:
Your search returned 11 results in total.
| CUREDI ID | Question at stake | Country | Official Citation | Date of decision | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUREDI033DE004 | Whether the perpetrators of a homicide who acted, though reluctantly, on the order of a regional leader of the PKK (Partiya Karkerên Kurdistâne) and for fear of a loss of esteem in, and exclusion from, the Kurdish community fulfill the subjective requirements for establishing the presence of base motives . | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, Judgment of 20 February 2002, 5 StR 538/01 (BGH, Urteil vom 20. Februar 2002, 5 StR 538/01) |
2002-02-20 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
| CUREDI033DE005 | Whether the subjective requirements for establishing the presence of base motives are fulfilled in the case of an Anatolian husband who kills his “Westernized” wife. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, Judgment of 28 January 2004, 2 StR 452/03 (BGH, Urteil vom 28. Januar 2004, 2 StR 452/03) |
2004-01-28 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
| CUREDI033DE007 | Whether honour killing amounts to murder under specific aggravating circumstances. | Germany | Regional Court Detmold, Judgement of 16 May 2012, 4 Ks 31 Js 1086/11 – 10/12 (LG Detmold, Urteil vom 16. Mai 2012, 4 Ks 31 Js 1086/11 -10/12)
ECLI:DE:LGDT:2012:0516.4KS31JS1086.11.10.00
|
2012-05-16 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
| CUREDI033DE008 | Whether the possibility of aiding and abetting by omission in honour killing cases is recognized in case law. | Germany | Regional Court Detmold, Judgement of 4 February 2013, 4 Ks -31 Js 184/12 -56-12, 4 Ks 56/12 (LG Detmold, Urteil vom 4. Februar 2013, 4 Ks -31 Js 184/12 -56-12, 4 Ks 56/12)
ECLI:DE:LGDT:2013:0204.4KS31JS184.12.56.00
|
2013-02-04 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
| CUREDI033DE011 | Whether the assumption that the perpetrator in an honour killing case had carried out the decision of a family council should play a role in sentencing. | Germany | Regional Court Hagen , Criminal Division with lay judges, Judgment of 19 January 2010, 52 KLs 400 Js 552/08 -9/09 (LG Hagen, Schwurgericht, Urteil vom 19. Januar 2010, 52 KLs 400 Js 552/08 -9/09)
ECLI:DE:LGHA:2010:0119.52KLS400JS552.08.00
|
2010-01-19 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
| CUREDI033DE012 | Whether the motive of restoring one’s honour is a base motive. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 5. Division, Judgment of 22 July 2020, 5 StR 543/19 (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH, 5.Strafsenat, Urteil vom 22. Juli 2020, 5 StR 543/19)
ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:220720U5STR543.19.0
|
2020-07-22 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
| CUREDI033DE021 | Whether the father of the victim, who did not actively commit the criminal act himself, can be punished as a co-perpetrator of murder under specific aggravating circumstances. | Germany | Regional Court Kleve, Judgment of 29 December 2009, 170 Kls -101 Js 105/09 10/09 (LG Kleve, Urteil vom 29.Dezember 2009, 170 Kls -101 Js 105/09-10/09)
ECLI:DE:LGKLE:2009:1229.170KLS101JS105.09.00
|
2009-12-29 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
| CUREDI033DE022 | Whether and under what conditions behavioural patterns, ideas, and views rooted in a foreign legal system can be taken into account in the mitigation of punishment. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 1st Criminal Division, Judgment of 7 November 2006, 307/06 (BGH Urteil vom 7. November 2006, 1 StR 307/06) |
2006-11-07 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
| CUREDI033DE024 | Whether attempting to kill a person because of a harmless compliment to the perpetrator's girlfriend amounts to murder under aggravating circumstances for base motives. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 5th Criminal Division, Judgment of 13 November 2019, 5 StR 466/19 (BGH Urteil vom. 13. November 2019 , 5 StR 466/19)
ECLI:DE:BGH:2019:131119U5STR466.19.0
|
2019-11-13 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
| CUREDI033DE030 | 1) Whether the sentence handed down to a perpetrator who treacherously kills his wife’s alleged lover can be mitigated based on the existence of exceptional circumstances. 2) Whether a crisis experienced by the perpetrator as a result of the values of his region of origin can constitute such exceptional circumstances. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 1st Criminal Division, Judgment of 10 May 2005, 30/05 (BGH, Urteil vom 10.05.2005, 1 StR 30/05) |
2005-05-10 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
| CUREDI041UK020 | 1) Whether the Family Court has jurisdiction to make a Forced Marriage Protection Order (FMPO*) where the person requiring protection is an adult with mental capacity to make relevant decisions and opposing the FMPO, and whether an indefinite ‘passport order’ could be made as part of the FMPO. 2) What approach shall the Family Court take when balancing the right to be protected under Article 3 and right to private and family life under Article 8 of the ECHR. | United Kingdom | Re K (Forced Marriage: Passport Order) 2020 EWCA Civ 190 |
2020-02-21 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |