Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology

Claimed cases: results

6 claimed cases found:

Your search returned 6 results in total.

CUREDI ID Question at stake Country Official Citation Date of decision Author
CUREDI013UK002 1) Whether Christians in Pakistan face serious discrimination that amounts to persecution under the Refugee Convention or the ECHR. 2) What risk that Evangelical Christians face in Pakistan. 3) What particular discrimination Christian women face in Pakistan. United Kingdom AK and SK (Christians: risk) Pakistan CG [2014] UKUT 00569 (IAC)
2014-12-15 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK003 Whether, firstly, the First Tier Tribunal erred in law when it found that it would be unduly harsh for the applicant to relocate elsewhere in Nigeria, and secondly, whether the Upper Tribunal erred when it ruled that the First Tier Tribunal had found that the risk of persecution to the claimant existed throughout Nigeria. United Kingdom Oco v A Decision of The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) [2012] CSIH 65
2012-07-26 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK005 Whether the adjudicator was correct to grant refugee status to the respondent based on the finding that (1) the respondent was at risk of persecution due to his religious beliefs, and (2) the evidence presented supported the claim that the risk of persecution would be greater upon his return to Cameroon. United Kingdom Secretary of State for the Home Department v Meli [2002] UKIAT 06977
2003-03-03 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK010 Was it correct for the adjudicator to grant asylum to BL, the respondent, due to his fear of being persecuted for his refusal to join the Aro cult? In particular, (1) did the persecution fall within one of the Refugee Convention grounds (i.e., political opinion, race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group)? (2) was internal protection possible for BL? (3) was internal relocation possible for BL? United Kingdom BL (Ogboni Cult – Protection – Relocation) Nigeria CG [2002] UKIAT 01708
2007-02-17 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK012 Whether it was correct for the Secretary of State to certify the claimant’s asylum claim as clearly unfounded on the grounds that (1) the state of origin would afford the claimant sufficient protection; and (2) internal relocation was possible. United Kingdom Obasi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWHC 381 (Admin)
2007-02-17 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK016 Whether internal relocation was a viable alternative for the appellant, an asylum seeker from the Gambia who feared witchcraft persecution on the ground of religious beliefs. United Kingdom Ismaila Demba v SSHD [2015] UKUT 01405 (IAC)
2015-08-25 Katia Bianchini View

New search Refine search