Claimed cases: results
16 claimed cases found:
Your search returned 16 results in total.
| CUREDI ID | Question at stake | Country | Official Citation | Date of decision | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUREDI013UK001 | Whether the discrimination faced by an albino child in Nigeria could amount to persecution. | United Kingdom | JA (child – risk of persecution) Nigeria [2016] UKUT 00560 (IAC) |
2016-11-24 | Katia Bianchini |
View |
| CUREDI013UK003 | Whether, firstly, the First Tier Tribunal erred in law when it found that it would be unduly harsh for the applicant to relocate elsewhere in Nigeria, and secondly, whether the Upper Tribunal erred when it ruled that the First Tier Tribunal had found that the risk of persecution to the claimant existed throughout Nigeria. | United Kingdom | Oco v A Decision of The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) [2012] CSIH 65 |
2012-07-26 | Katia Bianchini |
View |
| CUREDI013UK005 | Whether the adjudicator was correct to grant refugee status to the respondent based on the finding that (1) the respondent was at risk of persecution due to his religious beliefs, and (2) the evidence presented supported the claim that the risk of persecution would be greater upon his return to Cameroon. | United Kingdom | Secretary of State for the Home Department v Meli [2002] UKIAT 06977 |
2003-03-03 | Katia Bianchini |
View |
| CUREDI013UK006 | Whether, under the Refugee Convention, women and girls from Ethiopia constitute a particular social group (PSG) and, if they do, whether relocation to another part of Ethiopia should be seen as a feasible option for them to pursue if seeking refuge. | United Kingdom | RG (Ethiopia) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 339 |
2006-04-04 | Katia Bianchini |
View |
| CUREDI013UK004 | Whether adequate reasons were provided by tribunals when offering their conclusion that the appellant had failed to demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution under the Refugee Convention on the grounds of (a) her illegal exit from Iran, (b) her membership in a social group (that of women suffering domestic violence), and (c) her conversion to Christianity. | United Kingdom | AS (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] ECWA 1539 |
2017-10-12 | Katia Bianchini |
View |
| CUREDI013UK007 | Whether the continued inclusion of Pakistan on a “White List” of countries considered to be safe countries for asylum purposes is justified. | United Kingdom | Secretary Of State For Home Department (SSHD) v Javed and Others [2001] EWCA Civ 789 |
2001-05-17 | Katia Bianchini |
View |
| CUREDI013UK010 | Was it correct for the adjudicator to grant asylum to BL, the respondent, due to his fear of being persecuted for his refusal to join the Aro cult? In particular, (1) did the persecution fall within one of the Refugee Convention grounds (i.e., political opinion, race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group)? (2) was internal protection possible for BL? (3) was internal relocation possible for BL? | United Kingdom | BL (Ogboni Cult – Protection – Relocation) Nigeria CG [2002] UKIAT 01708 |
2007-02-17 | Katia Bianchini |
View |
| CUREDI013UK012 | Whether it was correct for the Secretary of State to certify the claimant’s asylum claim as clearly unfounded on the grounds that (1) the state of origin would afford the claimant sufficient protection; and (2) internal relocation was possible. | United Kingdom | Obasi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWHC 381 (Admin) |
2007-02-17 | Katia Bianchini |
View |
| CUREDI041UK004 | Whether, and to what extent, a female victim of trafficking returning to Nigeria is sufficiently protected against the risk of being re-trafficked and whether internal relocation is possible for her. | United Kingdom | HD (Trafficked Women) Nigeria CG [2016] UKUT 00454 |
2016-10-17 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK006 | 1. Whether intact females in The Gambia face a real risk of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and whether internal relocation is available to them. 2. Whether parental opposition to FGM is sufficient to prevent a female from The Gambia from being subjected to FGM when the extended family practices it. | United Kingdom | K and Others (FGM) The Gambia CG [2013] UKUT 00062 |
2016-10-13 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK014 | 1) Whether “women in the Ivory Coast” form a particular social group (PSG) under the Refugee Convention. 2) Whether the appellant– a Muslim woman with an illegitimate child and a victim of female genital mutilation (FGM), forced marriage, and domestic violence – would upon return to the Ivory Coast face a real risk of persecution under the Refugee Convention or treatment contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). 3) Whether the removal of the appellant and her child from the UK would be in breach of their rights under Article 8 of the ECHR, and 4) Whether sufficient protection and internal relocation would be available for them within the Ivory Coast. | United Kingdom | MD (Women) Ivory Coast v SSHD CG [2010] UKUT 215 (IAC) |
2010-07-07 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK001 | Whether the appellants, as women victims of trafficking in Albania, are members of a ‘particular social group’ under the Refugee Convention, and whether internal relocation is possible for them. | United Kingdom | AM and BM (Trafficked women) Albania CG [2010] UKUT 80 (IAC) |
2010-02-18 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK002 | Whether “former victims of trafficking” and “former victims of trafficking for sexual exploitation” can be members of a “particular social group” (PSG) under the Refugee Convention. Whether the appellant is at risk of persecution in Moldova based on membership in such a group. | United Kingdom | SB (PSG – Protection Regulations – Reg 6) Moldova CG [2008] UKAIT 00002 |
2007-04-26 | Iulia Mirzac; Katia Bianchini |
View |
| CUREDI041UK003 | Whether members of a family involved in a blood feud in Albania form a “particular social group” under the Refugee Convention and whether internal relocation is possible for them. | United Kingdom | EH (blood feuds) Albania CG [2012] UKUT 00348 (IAC) |
2012-10-15 | Iulia Mirzac; Katia Bianchini |
View |
| CUREDI013UK017 | Whether the claimant, who was a Turkish woman facing a non-consensual arranged marriage, and who feared persecution at the hands of their family on their discovery that she had breached social norms mandating pre-marital virginity, was, therefore, qualified for protection under the Refugee Convention. | United Kingdom | SSHD v YK (PSG - Women) Turkey CG [2002] UKIAT 05491 |
2002-10-28 | Katia Bianchini; Libby Johnston |
View |
| CUREDI041UK015 | 1. Whether women in Afghanistan can form a “particular social group” (PSG) under the 1951 Refugee Convention. 2. Whether the appellant, a woman without a male family member or tribal support, would face a real risk of persecution under the Refugee Convention upon return to Afghanistan. 3. Whether internal relocation is possible for them. | United Kingdom | NS (Social Group – Women - Forced Marriage) Afghanistan CG [2004] UKIAT 00328 |
2004-12-30 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |