Claimed cases: results
32 claimed cases found:
Your search returned 32 results in total.
CUREDI ID | Question at stake | Country | Official Citation | Date of decision | Author | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUREDI033DE001 | Whether male circumcision constitutes bodily harm? | Germany | Regional Court Cologne, Judgment of 07 May 2012, 151 Ns 169/11 (LG Köln, Urteil vom 07.05.2012, 151 Ns 169/11)
ECLI:DE:LGK:2012:0507.151NS169.11.00
|
2012-05-07 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE002 | Whether the consent of the father is sufficient for the circumcision of his son. | Germany | Local Court Essen, Judgement of 01 September 2016, 58 Ls 91/16 (AG Essen, Urteil vom 01. September 2016, 58 Ls 91/16)
ECLI:DE:AGE1:2016:0901.58LS91.16.00
|
2016-09-01 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE003 | Whether evaluating a motive as base has to be based on the views of the German legal community. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, Judgment of 07 October 1994, 5 StR 319/94 (BGH, Urteil vom 07. Oktober 1994, 5 StR 319/94) |
1994-10-07 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE004 | Whether the perpetrators of a homicide who acted, though reluctantly, on the order of a regional leader of the PKK (Partiya Karkerên Kurdistâne) and for fear of a loss of esteem in, and exclusion from, the Kurdish community fulfill the subjective requirements for establishing the presence of base motives . | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, Judgment of 20 February 2002, 5 StR 538/01 (BGH, Urteil vom 20. Februar 2002, 5 StR 538/01) |
2002-02-20 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE005 | Whether the subjective requirements for establishing the presence of base motives are fulfilled in the case of an Anatolian husband who kills his “Westernized” wife. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, Judgment of 28 January 2004, 2 StR 452/03 (BGH, Urteil vom 28. Januar 2004, 2 StR 452/03) |
2004-01-28 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE006 | Whether the motive of vendetta is a base motive according to German law. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, Order of 10 January 2006, 5 StR 341/05 (BGH, Beschluss vom 10. Januar 2006, 5 StR 341/05) |
2006-01-10 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE007 | Whether honour killing amounts to murder under specific aggravating circumstances. | Germany | Regional Court Detmold, Judgement of 16 May 2012, 4 Ks 31 Js 1086/11 – 10/12 (LG Detmold, Urteil vom 16. Mai 2012, 4 Ks 31 Js 1086/11 -10/12)
ECLI:DE:LGDT:2012:0516.4KS31JS1086.11.10.00
|
2012-05-16 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE008 | Whether the possibility of aiding and abetting by omission in honour killing cases is recognized in case law. | Germany | Regional Court Detmold, Judgement of 4 February 2013, 4 Ks -31 Js 184/12 -56-12, 4 Ks 56/12 (LG Detmold, Urteil vom 4. Februar 2013, 4 Ks -31 Js 184/12 -56-12, 4 Ks 56/12)
ECLI:DE:LGDT:2013:0204.4KS31JS184.12.56.00
|
2013-02-04 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE009 | Whether a traditional religious marriage in Turkey (Imam marriage) fulfills the requirements of a marriage within the meaning of section 237 German Penal Code. | Germany | Regional Court Kaiserslautern, Judgment of 26 January 2017, 6042 Js 217/13 – 4 KLs (LG Kaiserslautern, Urteil vom 26.01.2017, 6042 Js 217/13 – 4 KLs)
ECLI:DE:LGKAISE:2017:0126.6042JS217.134KLS.0A
|
2017-01-26 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI017BG007 | Whether cultural defence could outweigh the principle of the best interest of the child in cases prosecuting parents for the crime of facilitating early customary marriages. | Bulgaria | Regional Court Haskovo, Judgement of 6 July 2017, Criminal Appeals Case (VNAHD) No. 269/ 2017 (Reshenie № 98/ 06.07.2017 g., VNAHD № 269/ 2017 / Решение № 98 от 06.07.2017 г., ВНАХД № 269/ 2017 г.)
ECLI:BG:DC560:2017:20170600269.001
|
2017-07-06 | Maria G. Nikolova |
View |
CUREDI008SK002 | Whether the term “Gypsy” together with the word “parasites” is defamatory when used in public space to refer to members of the Roma minority, including by politicians and public figures. | Slovakia | Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic in Bratislava, Judgement of 19 March 2013, 4Tdo/49/2012 (Rozsudok Najvyššieho súdu Slovenskej republiky v Bratislave zo dňa 19 marca 2013 r., 4Tdo/49/2012)
ECLI:SK:NSSR:2019:6110011469.1
|
2013-03-19 | Hanna Vasilevich |
View |
CUREDI033DE011 | Whether the assumption that the perpetrator in an honour killing case had carried out the decision of a family council should play a role in sentencing. | Germany | Regional Court Hagen , Criminal Division with lay judges, Judgment of 19 January 2010, 52 KLs 400 Js 552/08 -9/09 (LG Hagen, Schwurgericht, Urteil vom 19. Januar 2010, 52 KLs 400 Js 552/08 -9/09)
ECLI:DE:LGHA:2010:0119.52KLS400JS552.08.00
|
2010-01-19 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE012 | Whether the motive of restoring one’s honour is a base motive. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 5. Division, Judgment of 22 July 2020, 5 StR 543/19 (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH, 5.Strafsenat, Urteil vom 22. Juli 2020, 5 StR 543/19)
ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:220720U5STR543.19.0
|
2020-07-22 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE013 | Whether a homicide committed out of anger over an insult may fulfil one of the requirements of murder under specific aggravating circumstances due to the existence of base motives. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 1. Criminal Division, Judgement of 11 October 2005, 1 StR 195/05 (BGH 1. Strafsenat, Urteil vom 11. Oktober 2005,1 StR 195/05) |
2005-10-11 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE014 | Whether it is possible, when sentencing, to take into consideration the ideas of a person who has grown up in a foreign legal order. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, Judgment of 27 January 2011, 2 StR 493/10 (BGH, Urteil vom 27. Januar 2011, 2 StR 493/10) |
2011-01-27 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE021 | Whether the father of the victim, who did not actively commit the criminal act himself, can be punished as a co-perpetrator of murder under specific aggravating circumstances. | Germany | Regional Court Kleve, Judgment of 29 December 2009, 170 Kls -101 Js 105/09 10/09 (LG Kleve, Urteil vom 29.Dezember 2009, 170 Kls -101 Js 105/09-10/09)
ECLI:DE:LGKLE:2009:1229.170KLS101JS105.09.00
|
2009-12-29 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE015 | Whether the pressure on the perpetrator by his family to commit the crime, resulting from ideas from other cultures, may be assessed as a mitigating circumstance in favour of the perpetrator. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, Fourth Criminal Division, Judgment of 01 February 2007, 4 StR 514/06 (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH 4. Strafsenat, Urteil vom 01. Februar 2007, 4 StR 514/06) |
2007-02-01 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE016 | Whether ideas rooted in the original culture of perpetrator and victim may be taken into consideration in assessing a spousal rape as a less serious case (Art.177 para 5 German Penal Code). | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 2nd Criminal Division, Judgment of 29 August 2001, 2 StR 276/01 (BGH 2. Strafsenat, Urteil vom 29.08.2001, 2 StR 276/01) |
2001-08-29 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE017 | Whether “archaic” (“archaische”) traditions in which the perpetrator is rooted, may be regarded a mitigating circumstance if, in the perpetrators’ country of origin, state law punishes the described acts. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 1. Criminal Division, Order of 18 August 2009, 1 StR 351/09 (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH 1. Strafsenat, Beschluss vom 18. August 2009, 1 StR 351/09) |
2009-08-18 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE018 | Whether a homicide committed out of anger over an insult may fulfil one of the possible criteria for murder under specific aggravating circumstances, namely the existence of base motives. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 5th Criminal Division, Judgement of 28 November 2018, 5StR 379/18 (BGH 5. Strafsenat, Urteil vom 28. November 2018, 5 StR 379/18)
ECLI:DE:BGH:2018:281118U5STR379.18.0
|
2018-11-28 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE019 | Whether a mediation process carried out according to norms of a cultural minority can qualify as a legitimate form of reconciliation within the meaning of Section 46 a of the German Penal Code. | Germany | Regional Court Freiburg, 10th Small Criminal Chamber, Judgment of 18 June 2019, 63/17 10 Ns 130 Js 3000/17 (LG Freiburg 10. Kleine Strafkammer, Urteil vom 18.Juni 2019, 63/17 10 Ns 130 Js 3000/17)
ECLI:DE:LGFREIB:2019:0618.63.17.10NS130JS30.00
|
2019-06-18 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE020 | Whether a Yezidi clergyman present at a reconciliation meeting has the right to refuse to give evidence. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 4th Criminal Division, Judgement of 15 April 2010 4 StR 650/09 (BGH 4. Strafsenat, Urteil vom 15. April 2010, 4 StR 650/09) |
2010-04-15 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI023NL005 | Whether a man, after having concluded an informal customary marriage in Morocco, committed a criminal act of bigamy by subsequently entering into a second marriage in the Netherlands. | Netherlands | Supreme Court, Decision of 1 December 2009 (Hoge Raad 1 december 2009)
ECLI:NL:HR:2009:BJ2779
|
2009-12-01 | Susan Rutten |
View |
CUREDI033DE022 | Whether and under what conditions behavioural patterns, ideas, and views rooted in a foreign legal system can be taken into account in the mitigation of punishment. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 1st Criminal Division, Judgment of 7 November 2006, 307/06 (BGH Urteil vom 7. November 2006, 1 StR 307/06) |
2006-11-07 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE023 | Whether a killing in a blood feud can be insidious (heimtückisch). | Germany | Regional Court Dortmund, Judgement of 7 July 2003, C1/02 (LG Dortmund, Urteil vom 7. Juli 2003, C 1/02)
ECLI:DE:LGDO:2003:0707.14SCHW.C1.02.00
|
2003-07-07 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE024 | Whether attempting to kill a person because of a harmless compliment to the perpetrator's girlfriend amounts to murder under aggravating circumstances for base motives. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 5th Criminal Division, Judgment of 13 November 2019, 5 StR 466/19 (BGH Urteil vom. 13. November 2019 , 5 StR 466/19)
ECLI:DE:BGH:2019:131119U5STR466.19.0
|
2019-11-13 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE025 | Whether minors can participate as private accessory prosecutors (Nebenkläger) in child abuse proceedings without parental consent if they fear that their parents’ knowledge of their participation could seriously endanger their lives given the high value commonly attached to honour in their culture of origin. | Germany | Regional Court Berlin, 30. Criminal Division, Decision of 27 November 2009, 530 - 37/09, (530) 5 Ju Js 343/07 (37/09) (LG Berlin, 30. Strafkammer, Beschluss vom 27. November 2009, 530 - 37/09, (530) 5 Ju Js 343/07 (37/09) )
ECLI:DE:LGBE:2009:1127.530.37.09.0A
|
2009-11-27 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE028 | Whether calling a someone a “homosexual” is an insult. | Germany | Regional Court Tübingen, 24. Small Criminal Division, Judgement of 18 July 2012, 24 Ns (13 Js) 10523/11 (LG Tübingen, 24. Kl. Strafkammer, Urteil vom 18.7.2012, 24 Ns (13 Js) 10523/11)
ECLI:DE:LGTUEBI:2012:0718.24NS13JS10523.11.0A
|
2012-07-18 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE030 | 1) Whether the sentence handed down to a perpetrator who treacherously kills his wife’s alleged lover can be mitigated based on the existence of exceptional circumstances. 2) Whether a crisis experienced by the perpetrator as a result of the values of his region of origin can constitute such exceptional circumstances. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 1st Criminal Division, Judgment of 10 May 2005, 30/05 (BGH, Urteil vom 10.05.2005, 1 StR 30/05) |
2005-05-10 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE031 | Whether the evening walk of a group of young men in a German city centre, wearing high-visibility vests with the words "Shariah Police" printed on the back, constitutes a violation of the ban on uniforms, as stipulated in Section 3 of Germany's Assembly Act or Versammlungsgesetz. | Germany | Regional Court Wuppertal, Judgment of 27 May 2019, 26 KLs 20/18 (LG Wuppertal, Urteil vom 27. Mai 2019, 26 KLs 20/18)
ECLI:DE:LGW:2019:0527.26KLS8209.50JS180.00
|
2019-05-27 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI033DE032 | Whether certain outcomes of an offender’s upbringing, influenced by cultural customs in his or her country of origin, can be regarded as harmful inclinations in the context of juvenile criminal law. | Germany | Regional Court Hamburg, 17th Grand Criminal Division, Judgment of 29 August 2016, 617 KLs 11/16 jug. (LG Hamburg, 17. Große Strafkammer, Urteil vom 29. August 2016, 617 KLs 11/16 jug.)
ECLI:DE:LGHH:2016:0829.617KLS11.16JUG.0A
|
2016-08-29 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
CUREDI041UK020 | 1) Whether the Family Court has jurisdiction to make a Forced Marriage Protection Order (FMPO*) where the person requiring protection is an adult with mental capacity to make relevant decisions and opposing the FMPO, and whether an indefinite ‘passport order’ could be made as part of the FMPO. 2) What approach shall the Family Court take when balancing the right to be protected under Article 3 and right to private and family life under Article 8 of the ECHR. | United Kingdom | Re K (Forced Marriage: Passport Order) 2020 EWCA Civ 190 |
2020-02-21 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |