Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology

Using Tort Action in Dutch Marital Captivity Cases in Order to Obtain a Foreign Divorce

by Fei An Kersten

Question(s) at stake

Whether a spouse’s refusal to cooperate with divorce proceedings under Iranian law, specifically by not appearing before the Iranian embassy after obtaining a civil divorce under Dutch law, may be considered wrongful towards the other spouse.

Outcome of the ruling

The spouse’s refusal to cooperate in the divorce may be considered wrongful depending on the balance of interests between the two parties. An important factor is the extent to which the spouse’s freedom to remarry is impeded by the failure to obtain a divorce that conforms to Iranian law.

Country:

Netherlands

Official citation

District Court Noord-Nederland, Judgement of 9 March 2022, ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2022:671 (Uitspraak Rechtbank Noord-Nederland, 9 maart 2022, ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2022:671).

ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2022:671

Topic(s)

Keywords:

Dissolution of marriage and partnership Divorce Right to marry and to found a family Right to respect for family life Right to respect for private life Situations created abroad Legal toolbox Rights and freedoms

Tag(s):

Marital captivity Iranian marriage Iranian divorce law Tort

Bibliographic information

Kersten, Fei An (2024): Using Tort Action in Dutch Marital Captivity Cases in Order to Obtain a Foreign Divorce, Department of Law and Anthropology, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Halle (Saale), Germany, CUREDI076NL010, https://doi.org/10.48509/CUREDI076NL010.

About the authors

Fei An Kersten (Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, Netherlands)