Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology

Culture as a Normative Argument Illustrated by the Example of the Classification of Animals as Pets in Residential Tenancy Law

by Lisa Katharina Simonis

Question(s) at stake

Whether keeping chickens is part of the contractually agreed use of a rented apartment in a German city.

Outcome of the ruling

The keeping of chickens is not part of the contractually agreed use of a rented apartment in the city. The defendant is ordered to remove the chickens from his apartment and is prohibited from acquiring chickens again in the future without the plaintiff’s permission.

Country:

Germany

Official citation

Local Court Cologne, Judgment of 16 June 2010, 214 C 255/09 (AG Köln, Urteil vom 16. Juni 2010, 214 C 255/09)

ECLI:DE:AGK:2010:0616.214C255.09.00

Topic(s)

Keywords:

Landlords Tenants Contracts Interpretations of behaviour

Tag(s):

Kulturkreis Duty of Considerateness Social conditions Animal welfare

Bibliographic information

Simonis, Lisa Katharina (2025): Culture as a Normative Argument Illustrated by the Example of the Classification of Animals as Pets in Residential Tenancy Law, Department of Law and Anthropology, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Halle (Saale), Germany, CUREDI110DE002, https://doi.org/10.48509/CUREDI110DE002.

About the authors

Lisa Katharina Simonis (Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Department Law and Anthropology, Germany) ORCID logo

Portrait picture of Lisa Katharina Simonis

Lisa Simonis is a PhD Candidate at the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, affiliated with the research group ‘Transformations in Private Law: Culture, Climate, and Technology’, led by Prof Dr Mareike Schmidt. She completed her law studies at the University of Münster and the University of Helsinki and passed the first state examination in law. Her current research focuses on the influence of perceptions of normality in German residential tenancy law. To this end, qualitative methods from anthropology will be used to investigate how these perceptions become visible in tenancy law processes and how this influences the application of the law in individual cases.