Claimed cases: results
15 claimed cases found:
Your search returned 15 results in total.
| CUREDI ID | Question at stake | Country | Official Citation | Date of decision | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUREDI041UK003 | Whether members of a family involved in a blood feud in Albania form a “particular social group” under the Refugee Convention and whether internal relocation is possible for them. | United Kingdom | EH (blood feuds) Albania CG [2012] UKUT 00348 (IAC) |
2012-10-15 | Iulia Mirzac; Katia Bianchini |
View |
| CUREDI041UK001 | Whether the appellants, as women victims of trafficking in Albania, are members of a ‘particular social group’ under the Refugee Convention, and whether internal relocation is possible for them. | United Kingdom | AM and BM (Trafficked women) Albania CG [2010] UKUT 80 (IAC) |
2010-02-18 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK004 | Whether, and to what extent, a female victim of trafficking returning to Nigeria is sufficiently protected against the risk of being re-trafficked and whether internal relocation is possible for her. | United Kingdom | HD (Trafficked Women) Nigeria CG [2016] UKUT 00454 |
2016-10-17 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK006 | 1. Whether intact females in The Gambia face a real risk of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and whether internal relocation is available to them. 2. Whether parental opposition to FGM is sufficient to prevent a female from The Gambia from being subjected to FGM when the extended family practices it. | United Kingdom | K and Others (FGM) The Gambia CG [2013] UKUT 00062 |
2016-10-13 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK007 | Whether a local authority’s application for a Female Genital Mutilation Protection Order (FGMPO) prohibiting the removal of the female infant from the UK to Sudan should be granted. Whether the FGMPO’s interference with the rights of the child and those of her family under Article 8 of the ECHR is justified to protect her rights under Article 3 of the ECHR. | United Kingdom | A Local Authority v M [2018] EWHC 870 (Fam) |
2018-04-19 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK011 | Whether the appellant, an unmarried woman with an illegitimate mixed-race child, would face upon return to Azerbaijan a real risk of persecution under the Refugee Convention or treatment contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). | United Kingdom | SL (Unmarried Mother with Mixed Race Child) Azerbaijan CG [2013] UKUT 00046 (IAC) |
2013-02-13 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK014 | 1) Whether “women in the Ivory Coast” form a particular social group (PSG) under the Refugee Convention. 2) Whether the appellant– a Muslim woman with an illegitimate child and a victim of female genital mutilation (FGM), forced marriage, and domestic violence – would upon return to the Ivory Coast face a real risk of persecution under the Refugee Convention or treatment contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). 3) Whether the removal of the appellant and her child from the UK would be in breach of their rights under Article 8 of the ECHR, and 4) Whether sufficient protection and internal relocation would be available for them within the Ivory Coast. | United Kingdom | MD (Women) Ivory Coast v SSHD CG [2010] UKUT 215 (IAC) |
2010-07-07 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK015 | 1. Whether women in Afghanistan can form a “particular social group” (PSG) under the 1951 Refugee Convention. 2. Whether the appellant, a woman without a male family member or tribal support, would face a real risk of persecution under the Refugee Convention upon return to Afghanistan. 3. Whether internal relocation is possible for them. | United Kingdom | NS (Social Group – Women - Forced Marriage) Afghanistan CG [2004] UKIAT 00328 |
2004-12-30 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK020 | 1) Whether the Family Court has jurisdiction to make a Forced Marriage Protection Order (FMPO*) where the person requiring protection is an adult with mental capacity to make relevant decisions and opposing the FMPO, and whether an indefinite ‘passport order’ could be made as part of the FMPO. 2) What approach shall the Family Court take when balancing the right to be protected under Article 3 and right to private and family life under Article 8 of the ECHR. | United Kingdom | Re K (Forced Marriage: Passport Order) 2020 EWCA Civ 190 |
2020-02-21 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK021 | Whether the petitioner was forced to enter into an arranged marriage and whether the marriage should be declared voidable on the ground of duress. | United Kingdom | NS v MI [2006] EWHC 1646 (Fam) |
2006-07-05 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK022 | What powers do the courts of England and Wales have concerning mentally-able adults at risk of forced marriage and how should those powers be exercised? | United Kingdom | RE SK (An Adult) (Forced Marriage: Approproate Relief) [2004] EWHC 3202 (Fam) |
2004-12-10 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK023 | Whether it fell within the court’s jurisdiction to make a minor with both Pakistani and British nationality a ward of court to enable her to travel to the UK from Pakistan, where she was believed to be at risk of being forced into a marriage. | United Kingdom | RB v FB and MA (Forced Marriage: Wardship: Jurisdiction) [2008] EWHC 1436 (Fam) |
2008-04-15 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK013 | 1) Whether Iranian citizens who “claim to have converted from Islam to Christianity” face a real risk of persecution as defined by the Refugee Convention or treatment contrary to their rights under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) on return to Iran. (para. 141) 2) Whether the appellant, as an Iranian who engaged in Christian activities abroad, would face a real risk of persecution upon return to Iran, regardless of whether he holds a genuine religious belief in Christianity. | United Kingdom | PS (Christianity - risk) Iran CG [2020] UKUT 00046 (IAC) |
2020-02-20 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK012 | 1) Whether the appellant, a divorced woman with an illegitimate child previously subjected to domestic violence, would upon return to Bangladesh face a real risk of persecution under the Refugee Convention or treatment contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), 2) Whether removing the appellant from the UK would be in breach of her and her first child’s rights under Article 8 of the ECHR, and 3) Whether internal relocation would be possible for her and her second child. | United Kingdom | SA (Divorced Woman – Illegitimate child) Bangladesh CG [2011] UKUT 00254 (IAC) |
2011-07-11 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK002 | Whether “former victims of trafficking” and “former victims of trafficking for sexual exploitation” can be members of a “particular social group” (PSG) under the Refugee Convention. Whether the appellant is at risk of persecution in Moldova based on membership in such a group. | United Kingdom | SB (PSG – Protection Regulations – Reg 6) Moldova CG [2008] UKAIT 00002 |
2007-04-26 | Iulia Mirzac; Katia Bianchini |
View |