Results
4 case reports found:
Your search returned 4 results in total.
| CUREDI ID | Question at stake | Country | Official Citation | Date of decision | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUREDI045AT006 | Whether Article 43a of the School Education Act, which prohibits children under the age of ten from wearing religious headwear in school, violates the freedom of religion and the right of parents to have their children educated in accordance with their religious and philosophical convictions. | Austria | Constitutional Court, Judgement of 11 December 2020, G 4/2020 (VfGH, Erkenntnis vom 11. Dezember 2020, G 4/2020)
ECLI:AT:VFGH:2020:G4.2020
|
2020-12-11 | Kerstin Wonisch; Alexander Ganepola |
View |
| CUREDI033DE031 | Whether the evening walk of a group of young men in a German city centre, wearing high-visibility vests with the words "Shariah Police" printed on the back, constitutes a violation of the ban on uniforms, as stipulated in Section 3 of Germany's Assembly Act or Versammlungsgesetz. | Germany | Regional Court Wuppertal, Judgment of 27 May 2019, 26 KLs 20/18 (LG Wuppertal, Urteil vom 27. Mai 2019, 26 KLs 20/18)
ECLI:DE:LGW:2019:0527.26KLS8209.50JS180.00
|
2019-05-27 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
| CUREDI043BE006 | 1) Whether a public-authority school can expand a ban on wearing religious signs based on its neutrality policy to apply to religious education teachers (when they are outside their classrooms), or whether the school must provide an exception for this particular category. 2) Whether the constitution places limits on the neutrality principle as it applies to state schools, given that the constitution also requires these schools to offer a wide range of religious courses taught by a special category of teachers who must be able to credibly represent their religion in their position at these public-authority schools. | Belgium | Council of State, Judgment of 01 February 2016, No. 233.672 (Conseil d’Etat, arrêt du 1 février 2016, n° 233.672)
no ECLI
|
2016-02-01 | Adriaan Overbeeke |
View |
| CUREDI101UK002 | Whether a company’s uniform policy prohibiting its employees from visibly wearing necklaces with religious symbols constitutes unlawful discrimination on grounds of religion. | United Kingdom | Eweida v British Airways Plc [2007] UKET 2702689/06 |
2007-12-19 | Ahmet Said Aydil |
View |