Claimed cases: results
6 claimed cases found:
Your search returned 6 results in total.
| CUREDI ID | Question at stake | Country | Official Citation | Date of decision | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUREDI033DE013 | Whether a homicide committed out of anger over an insult may fulfil one of the requirements of murder under specific aggravating circumstances due to the existence of base motives. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 1. Criminal Division, Judgement of 11 October 2005, 1 StR 195/05 (BGH 1. Strafsenat, Urteil vom 11. Oktober 2005,1 StR 195/05) |
2005-10-11 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
| CUREDI045RU007 | Whether the Chekhov Town Council’s refusal to allow the pastor of the Evangelical Church to hold religious services in a public area violated the rights to freedom of assembly and freedom of religion protected by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). | Russia | Barankevich v Russia, App no 10519/03, 26 July 2007
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0726JUD001051903
|
2007-07-26 | Kerstin Wonisch; Alexander Ganepola |
View |
| CUREDI033DE018 | Whether a homicide committed out of anger over an insult may fulfil one of the possible criteria for murder under specific aggravating circumstances, namely the existence of base motives. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 5th Criminal Division, Judgement of 28 November 2018, 5StR 379/18 (BGH 5. Strafsenat, Urteil vom 28. November 2018, 5 StR 379/18)
ECLI:DE:BGH:2018:281118U5STR379.18.0
|
2018-11-28 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
| CUREDI033DE024 | Whether attempting to kill a person because of a harmless compliment to the perpetrator's girlfriend amounts to murder under aggravating circumstances for base motives. | Germany | Federal Court of Justice, 5th Criminal Division, Judgment of 13 November 2019, 5 StR 466/19 (BGH Urteil vom. 13. November 2019 , 5 StR 466/19)
ECLI:DE:BGH:2019:131119U5STR466.19.0
|
2019-11-13 | Silvia Tellenbach |
View |
| CUREDI041UK020 | 1) Whether the Family Court has jurisdiction to make a Forced Marriage Protection Order (FMPO*) where the person requiring protection is an adult with mental capacity to make relevant decisions and opposing the FMPO, and whether an indefinite ‘passport order’ could be made as part of the FMPO. 2) What approach shall the Family Court take when balancing the right to be protected under Article 3 and right to private and family life under Article 8 of the ECHR. | United Kingdom | Re K (Forced Marriage: Passport Order) 2020 EWCA Civ 190 |
2020-02-21 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI041UK022 | What powers do the courts of England and Wales have concerning mentally-able adults at risk of forced marriage and how should those powers be exercised? | United Kingdom | RE SK (An Adult) (Forced Marriage: Approproate Relief) [2004] EWHC 3202 (Fam) |
2004-12-10 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |