Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology

Claimed cases: results

10 claimed cases found:

Your search returned 10 results in total.

CUREDI ID Question at stake Country Official Citation Date of decision Author
CUREDI013UK002 1) Whether Christians in Pakistan face serious discrimination that amounts to persecution under the Refugee Convention or the ECHR. 2) What risk that Evangelical Christians face in Pakistan. 3) What particular discrimination Christian women face in Pakistan. United Kingdom AK and SK (Christians: risk) Pakistan CG [2014] UKUT 00569 (IAC)
2014-12-15 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK005 Whether the adjudicator was correct to grant refugee status to the respondent based on the finding that (1) the respondent was at risk of persecution due to his religious beliefs, and (2) the evidence presented supported the claim that the risk of persecution would be greater upon his return to Cameroon. United Kingdom Secretary of State for the Home Department v Meli [2002] UKIAT 06977
2003-03-03 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK004 Whether adequate reasons were provided by tribunals when offering their conclusion that the appellant had failed to demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution under the Refugee Convention on the grounds of (a) her illegal exit from Iran, (b) her membership in a social group (that of women suffering domestic violence), and (c) her conversion to Christianity. United Kingdom AS (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] ECWA 1539
2017-10-12 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK007 Whether the continued inclusion of Pakistan on a “White List” of countries considered to be safe countries for asylum purposes is justified. United Kingdom Secretary Of State For Home Department (SSHD) v Javed and Others [2001] EWCA Civ 789
2001-05-17 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK008 Whether members of the Ahmadi sect could be at risk of religion-based persecution in Pakistan, and whether specific appellants would face persecution in Pakistan as a result of their affiliation to the Ahmadi sect. United Kingdom MN and Others (Ahmadis – Country Conditions – Risk) Pakistan CG [2012] UKUT 00389 (IAC)
2012-11-13 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK009 Whether the acts of the persecutor were connected to the appellant’s religion, in a way consistent with the grounds for persecution recognised under the Refugee Convention, and what is the meaning of the word “religion” under the Refugee Convention? United Kingdom Omoruyi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2000] ECWA Civ 258
2000-10-12 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK010 Was it correct for the adjudicator to grant asylum to BL, the respondent, due to his fear of being persecuted for his refusal to join the Aro cult? In particular, (1) did the persecution fall within one of the Refugee Convention grounds (i.e., political opinion, race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group)? (2) was internal protection possible for BL? (3) was internal relocation possible for BL? United Kingdom BL (Ogboni Cult – Protection – Relocation) Nigeria CG [2002] UKIAT 01708
2007-02-17 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI013UK012 Whether it was correct for the Secretary of State to certify the claimant’s asylum claim as clearly unfounded on the grounds that (1) the state of origin would afford the claimant sufficient protection; and (2) internal relocation was possible. United Kingdom Obasi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWHC 381 (Admin)
2007-02-17 Katia Bianchini View
CUREDI041UK013 1) Whether Iranian citizens who “claim to have converted from Islam to Christianity” face a real risk of persecution as defined by the Refugee Convention or treatment contrary to their rights under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) on return to Iran. (para. 141) 2) Whether the appellant, as an Iranian who engaged in Christian activities abroad, would face a real risk of persecution upon return to Iran, regardless of whether he holds a genuine religious belief in Christianity. United Kingdom PS (Christianity - risk) Iran CG [2020] UKUT 00046 (IAC)
2020-02-20 Iulia Mirzac View
CUREDI045AT006 Whether Article 43a of the School Education Act, which prohibits children under the age of ten from wearing religious headwear in school, violates the freedom of religion and the right of parents to have their children educated in accordance with their religious and philosophical convictions. Austria Constitutional Court, Judgement of 11 December 2020, G 4/2020 (VfGH, Erkenntnis vom 11. Dezember 2020, G 4/2020)
ECLI:AT:VFGH:2020:G4.2020
2020-12-11 Kerstin Wonisch; Alexander Ganepola View

New search Refine search