Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology

Claimed cases: results

5 claimed cases found:

Your search returned 5 results in total.

CUREDI ID Question at stake Country Official Citation Date of decision Author
CUREDI041UK020 1) Whether the Family Court has jurisdiction to make a Forced Marriage Protection Order (FMPO*) where the person requiring protection is an adult with mental capacity to make relevant decisions and opposing the FMPO, and whether an indefinite ‘passport order’ could be made as part of the FMPO. 2) What approach shall the Family Court take when balancing the right to be protected under Article 3 and right to private and family life under Article 8 of the ECHR. United Kingdom Re K (Forced Marriage: Passport Order) 2020 EWCA Civ 190
2020-02-21 Iulia Mirzac View
CUREDI041UK021 Whether the petitioner was forced to enter into an arranged marriage and whether the marriage should be declared voidable on the ground of duress. United Kingdom NS v MI [2006] EWHC 1646 (Fam)
2006-07-05 Iulia Mirzac View
CUREDI041UK022 What powers do the courts of England and Wales have concerning mentally-able adults at risk of forced marriage and how should those powers be exercised? United Kingdom RE SK (An Adult) (Forced Marriage: Approproate Relief) [2004] EWHC 3202 (Fam)
2004-12-10 Iulia Mirzac View
CUREDI041UK023 Whether it fell within the court’s jurisdiction to make a minor with both Pakistani and British nationality a ward of court to enable her to travel to the UK from Pakistan, where she was believed to be at risk of being forced into a marriage. United Kingdom RB v FB and MA (Forced Marriage: Wardship: Jurisdiction) [2008] EWHC 1436 (Fam)
2008-04-15 Iulia Mirzac View
CUREDI076NL010 Whether a spouse’s refusal to cooperate with divorce proceedings under Iranian law, specifically by not appearing before the Iranian embassy after obtaining a civil divorce under Dutch law, may be considered wrongful towards the other spouse. Netherlands District Court Noord-Nederland, Judgement of 9 March 2022, ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2022:671 (Uitspraak Rechtbank Noord-Nederland, 9 maart 2022, ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2022:671).
ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2022:671
2022-03-09 Fei An Kersten View

New search Refine search