Results
2 case reports found:
Your search returned 2 results in total.
| CUREDI ID | Question at stake | Country | Official Citation | Date of decision | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUREDI043BE002 | Whether tax legislation that henceforth limits a tax exemption for religious buildings to a specific category of state-funded religious communities, in order to guarantee that the tax exemption is only granted to “authentic” religions, is discriminatory and whether this legislation affects the neutrality obligation to which the government is bound. | Belgium | Constitutional Court ,14 November 2019, no. 178/2019, (Cour constitutionnelle, 14 novembre 2019, n° 178/2019)
ECLI:BE:GHCC:2019:ARR.20191114.4
|
2019-11-14 | Adriaan Overbeeke |
View |
| CUREDI043BE006 | 1) Whether a public-authority school can expand a ban on wearing religious signs based on its neutrality policy to apply to religious education teachers (when they are outside their classrooms), or whether the school must provide an exception for this particular category. 2) Whether the constitution places limits on the neutrality principle as it applies to state schools, given that the constitution also requires these schools to offer a wide range of religious courses taught by a special category of teachers who must be able to credibly represent their religion in their position at these public-authority schools. | Belgium | Council of State, Judgment of 01 February 2016, No. 233.672 (Conseil d’Etat, arrêt du 1 février 2016, n° 233.672)
no ECLI
|
2016-02-01 | Adriaan Overbeeke |
View |