Results
11 case reports found:
Your search returned 11 results in total.
| CUREDI ID | Question at stake | Country | Official Citation | Date of decision | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUREDI057BE002 | Whether a child marriage concluded in Somalia can be recognized in Belgium | Belgium | Family Court Liège, Judgment of 25 May 2018 (Tribunal de la famille Liège, 25 mai 2018) |
2018-05-25 | Jinske Verhellen; Sarah Den Haese |
View |
| CUREDI061BE001 | Whether the recognition in Belgium of a Moroccan repudiation breaches the Belgian public order? | Belgium | Court of Cassation, 29 April 2002 (Cour de Cassation, 29 avril 2002)
ECLI:BE:CASS:2002:ARR.20020429.3
|
2002-04-29 | Frederik Welvaert; Jinske Verhellen |
View |
| CUREDI061BE003 | Whether there are reasons to recognize a Moroccan talaq repudiation despite the unequal position of men and women in the context of this practice? | Belgium | Labour Court of Appeal of Brussels, Judgement of 13 April 2005, 40557 (Cour du Travail de Bruxelles, n° 40557, 13 avril 2005)
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2005:ARR.20050413.10
|
2005-04-13 | Yasmina El Kaddouri; Frederik Welvaert |
View |
| CUREDI012BE009 | Whether an Ahmadi marriage, which is not legally recognized in Pakistan, can be recognized in Belgium. | Belgium | Family Court of Brussels 18 November 2019 (Familierechtbank Brussel 18 november 2019) |
2019-11-18 | Frederik Welvaert; Jinske Verhellen |
View |
| CUREDI057BE004 | Whether a Moroccan *kafalah* judgment can be recognized in Belgium? | Belgium | Court of appeal of Antwerp, 16 May 2017 (Hof van beroep Antwerpen 16 mei 2017) and court of appeal of Antwerp, 25 May 2016 (Hof van beroep Antwerpen 25 mei 2016). The latter being an interim judgment. |
2017-05-16 | Yasmina El Kaddouri; Jinske Verhellen |
View |
| CUREDI057BE006 | Whether a Moroccan judgement granting kafalah can be converted into an adoption in Belgium. | Belgium | Court of Appeal Ghent, Judgement of 14 November 2019 (Hof van beroep Gent, 14 november 2019) |
2019-11-14 | Jinske Verhellen; Yasmina El Kaddouri |
View |
| CUREDI057BE007 | Whether the kafalah can produce legal effects in Belgium and whether kafalah should be converted into adoption? | Belgium | Court of Cassation 14 September 2015, No. AR C.13.0296.N (Hof van Cassatie 14 september 2015, AR C.13.0296.N) Court of Appeal Ghent 13 March 2013 (Hof van beroep Gent 13 maart 2013) |
2015-09-14 | Yasmina El Kaddouri; Jinske Verhellen |
View |
| CUREDI075BE001 | Whether a religious Ahmadi marriage can be recognized in Belgium. | Belgium | Court of appeal of Antwerp, Judgement of 9 March 2021, P.20.1171.N/1 (Hof van beroep Antwerpen, 9 maart 2021, P.20.1171.N/1)
ECLI:BE:CASS:2021:ARR.20210309.2N.9
|
2021-03-09 | Sarah Den Haese; Jinske Verhellen |
View |
| CUREDI043BE002 | Whether tax legislation that henceforth limits a tax exemption for religious buildings to a specific category of state-funded religious communities, in order to guarantee that the tax exemption is only granted to “authentic” religions, is discriminatory and whether this legislation affects the neutrality obligation to which the government is bound. | Belgium | Constitutional Court ,14 November 2019, no. 178/2019, (Cour constitutionnelle, 14 novembre 2019, n° 178/2019)
ECLI:BE:GHCC:2019:ARR.20191114.4
|
2019-11-14 | Adriaan Overbeeke |
View |
| CUREDI043BE004 | Whether an Orthodox Jewish school may refuse to enrol children whose Orthodox Jewish parents agree with the school’s pedagogical project and regulations but hold political views regarding Israel that are unacceptable to the majority in the school’s Orthodox community. | Belgium | Court of Appeal Antwerp, Judgment of 18 June 2013, no. 2012/AR/2910 (Hof van Beroep Antwerpen, 18 juni 2013, nr. 2012/AR/2910) |
2013-06-18 | Adriaan Overbeeke |
View |
| CUREDI043BE006 | 1) Whether a public-authority school can expand a ban on wearing religious signs based on its neutrality policy to apply to religious education teachers (when they are outside their classrooms), or whether the school must provide an exception for this particular category. 2) Whether the constitution places limits on the neutrality principle as it applies to state schools, given that the constitution also requires these schools to offer a wide range of religious courses taught by a special category of teachers who must be able to credibly represent their religion in their position at these public-authority schools. | Belgium | Council of State, Judgment of 01 February 2016, No. 233.672 (Conseil d’Etat, arrêt du 1 février 2016, n° 233.672)
no ECLI
|
2016-02-01 | Adriaan Overbeeke |
View |