Claimed cases: results
6 claimed cases found:
Your search returned 6 results in total.
| CUREDI ID | Question at stake | Country | Official Citation | Date of decision | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUREDI007LT004 | Whether the requirement to write personal names in the official language of the Republic of Lithuania in official documents potentially infringes upon the rights of national minority individuals to maintain their ethnic identity and privacy, as well as the principle of equality. | Lithuania | Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, Ruling of 21 October 1999, Case No. 14/98 "On the compliance of the Resolution of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Lithuania ‘On Writing Names and Family Names in Passports of Citizens of the Republic of Lithuania’ of 31 January 1991 with the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania” (1999 m. spalio 21 d. Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinio Teismo nutarimas dėl Lietuvos Respublikos Aukščiausiosios Tarybos 1991 m. sausio 31 d. nutarimo „Dėl vardų ir pavardžių rašymo Lietuvos Respublikos piliečio pase“ atitikimo Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucijai” (bylos Nr. 14/98)) |
1999-10-21 | Kiryl Kascian |
View |
| CUREDI041UK007 | Whether a local authority’s application for a Female Genital Mutilation Protection Order (FGMPO) prohibiting the removal of the female infant from the UK to Sudan should be granted. Whether the FGMPO’s interference with the rights of the child and those of her family under Article 8 of the ECHR is justified to protect her rights under Article 3 of the ECHR. | United Kingdom | A Local Authority v M [2018] EWHC 870 (Fam) |
2018-04-19 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI002FR012 | Whether the prohibition for a mother to expose her children to the members of Raëlism, the religious movement she adheres to, violates Articles 8, 9, 10, 11, both alone and in combination with Article 14 of the ECHR. | France | F.L. v. France, App. no. 61162/00, 03 November 2005
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1103DEC006116200
|
2005-11-03 | Alice Margaria |
View |
| CUREDI047DE003 | Whether a private association campaigning against abortion can, in view of its right to freedom of religion, be ordered not to address women who are about to enter a pregnancy counselling centre. | Germany | Higher Administrative Court Baden-Württemberg, Decision of 10 June 2011, 1 S 915/11 (VGH Baden-Württemberg, Beschluss vom 10. Juni 2011, 1 S 915/11)
ECLI:DE:VGHBW:2011:0610.1S915.11.0A
|
2011-06-10 | Adina Müller; Michael Germann |
View |
| CUREDI041UK020 | 1) Whether the Family Court has jurisdiction to make a Forced Marriage Protection Order (FMPO*) where the person requiring protection is an adult with mental capacity to make relevant decisions and opposing the FMPO, and whether an indefinite ‘passport order’ could be made as part of the FMPO. 2) What approach shall the Family Court take when balancing the right to be protected under Article 3 and right to private and family life under Article 8 of the ECHR. | United Kingdom | Re K (Forced Marriage: Passport Order) 2020 EWCA Civ 190 |
2020-02-21 | Iulia Mirzac |
View |
| CUREDI076NL010 | Whether a spouse’s refusal to cooperate with divorce proceedings under Iranian law, specifically by not appearing before the Iranian embassy after obtaining a civil divorce under Dutch law, may be considered wrongful towards the other spouse. | Netherlands | District Court Noord-Nederland, Judgement of 9 March 2022, ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2022:671 (Uitspraak Rechtbank Noord-Nederland, 9 maart 2022, ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2022:671).
ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2022:671
|
2022-03-09 | Fei An Kersten |
View |