Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology

Results

12 case reports found:

Your search returned 12 results in total.

CUREDI ID Question at stake Country Official Citation Date of decision Author
CUREDI047DE001 Whether marking the prison cell door of a Muslim inmate with the letter M – which stands for Muslim and is meant to denote that the inmate consumes pork-free food – violates the inmate’s right to negative freedom of religion. Germany Higher Regional Court Karlsruhe, Decision of 15 February 2018, 2 Ws 1/18 (OLG Karlsruhe, Beschluss vom 15 Februar 2018, 2 Ws 1/18)
ECLI:DE:OLGKARL:2018:0215.2WS1.18.00
2018-02-15 Adina Müller View
CUREDI041UK007 Whether a local authority’s application for a Female Genital Mutilation Protection Order (FGMPO) prohibiting the removal of the female infant from the UK to Sudan should be granted. Whether the FGMPO’s interference with the rights of the child and those of her family under Article 8 of the ECHR is justified to protect her rights under Article 3 of the ECHR. United Kingdom A Local Authority v M [2018] EWHC 870 (Fam)
 2018-04-19 Iulia Mirzac View
CUREDI047DE003 Whether a private association campaigning against abortion can, in view of its right to freedom of religion, be ordered not to address women who are about to enter a pregnancy counselling centre. Germany Higher Administrative Court Baden-Württemberg, Decision of 10 June 2011, 1 S 915/11 (VGH Baden-Württemberg, Beschluss vom 10. Juni 2011, 1 S 915/11)
ECLI:DE:VGHBW:2011:0610.1S915.11.0A
2011-06-10 Adina Müller; Michael Germann View
CUREDI045AT006 Whether Article 43a of the School Education Act, which prohibits children under the age of ten from wearing religious headwear in school, violates the freedom of religion and the right of parents to have their children educated in accordance with their religious and philosophical convictions. Austria Constitutional Court, Judgement of 11 December 2020, G 4/2020 (VfGH, Erkenntnis vom 11. Dezember 2020, G 4/2020)
ECLI:AT:VFGH:2020:G4.2020
2020-12-11 Kerstin Wonisch; Alexander Ganepola View
CUREDI045RU007 Whether the Chekhov Town Council’s refusal to allow the pastor of the Evangelical Church to hold religious services in a public area violated the rights to freedom of assembly and freedom of religion protected by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Russia Barankevich v Russia, App no 10519/03, 26 July 2007
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0726JUD001051903
2007-07-26 Kerstin Wonisch; Alexander Ganepola View
CUREDI033DE028 Whether calling a someone a “homosexual” is an insult. Germany Regional Court Tübingen, 24. Small Criminal Division, Judgement of 18 July 2012, 24 Ns (13 Js) 10523/11 (LG Tübingen, 24. Kl. Strafkammer, Urteil vom 18.7.2012, 24 Ns (13 Js) 10523/11)
ECLI:DE:LGTUEBI:2012:0718.24NS13JS10523.11.0A
2012-07-18 Silvia Tellenbach View
CUREDI043BE002 Whether tax legislation that henceforth limits a tax exemption for religious buildings to a specific category of state-funded religious communities, in order to guarantee that the tax exemption is only granted to “authentic” religions, is discriminatory and whether this legislation affects the neutrality obligation to which the government is bound. Belgium Constitutional Court ,14 November 2019, no. 178/2019, (Cour constitutionnelle, 14 novembre 2019, n° 178/2019)
ECLI:BE:GHCC:2019:ARR.20191114.4
2019-11-14 Adriaan Overbeeke View
CUREDI043BE004 Whether an Orthodox Jewish school may refuse to enrol children whose Orthodox Jewish parents agree with the school’s pedagogical project and regulations but hold political views regarding Israel that are unacceptable to the majority in the school’s Orthodox community. Belgium Court of Appeal Antwerp, Judgment of 18 June 2013, no. 2012/AR/2910 (Hof van Beroep Antwerpen, 18 juni 2013, nr. 2012/AR/2910)
 2013-06-18 Adriaan Overbeeke View
CUREDI089NL001 Whether (1) Islamic wilaya and hadana established abroad can be recognized by a Dutch court and (2) whether a father who is attributed wilaya can be excluded from his parental responsibility. Netherlands District Court of Zeeland-West Brabant, Judgement of 25 October 2019, C/02/337222 FARK 17-5918 (Rechtbank Zeeland-West Brabant, 25 oktober 2019)
ECLI:NL:RBZWB:2019:5975
2019-10-25 Ibtissam Rebbik View
CUREDI076NL010 Whether a spouse’s refusal to cooperate with divorce proceedings under Iranian law, specifically by not appearing before the Iranian embassy after obtaining a civil divorce under Dutch law, may be considered wrongful towards the other spouse. Netherlands District Court Noord-Nederland, Judgement of 9 March 2022, ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2022:671 (Uitspraak Rechtbank Noord-Nederland, 9 maart 2022, ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2022:671).
ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2022:671
2022-03-09 Fei An Kersten View
CUREDI043BE006 1) Whether a public-authority school can expand a ban on wearing religious signs based on its neutrality policy to apply to religious education teachers (when they are outside their classrooms), or whether the school must provide an exception for this particular category. 2) Whether the constitution places limits on the neutrality principle as it applies to state schools, given that the constitution also requires these schools to offer a wide range of religious courses taught by a special category of teachers who must be able to credibly represent their religion in their position at these public-authority schools. Belgium Council of State, Judgment of 01 February 2016, No. 233.672 (Conseil d’Etat, arrêt du 1 février 2016, n° 233.672)
no ECLI
2016-02-01 Adriaan Overbeeke View
CUREDI076NL013 Whether the court may refuse to apply foreign law, in this case Moroccan law, on the basis of the public order exception if a request for the denial of fatherhood is not available for the requesting party under that law. Netherlands District Court Rotterdam, Judgement of 27 January 2010, Case nr 327767/ F2 RK 09-694, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2010:BL1502 (Rechtbank Rotterdam 27 januari 2010, Zaaknr 327767/ F2 RK 09-694, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2010:BL1502)
ECLI:NL:RBROT:2010:BL1502
2010-01-27 Fei An Kersten View

New search Refine search