Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology

Results

21 case reports found:

Your search returned 21 results in total.

CUREDI ID Question at stake Country Official Citation Date of decision Author
CUREDI045AT006 Whether Article 43a of the School Education Act, which prohibits children under the age of ten from wearing religious headwear in school, violates the freedom of religion and the right of parents to have their children educated in accordance with their religious and philosophical convictions. Austria Constitutional Court, Judgement of 11 December 2020, G 4/2020 (VfGH, Erkenntnis vom 11. Dezember 2020, G 4/2020)
ECLI:AT:VFGH:2020:G4.2020
2020-12-11 Kerstin Wonisch; Alexander Ganepola View
CUREDI007LV007 Whether the increase in the percentage of instruction hours conducted in the official language in Latvia complies with the Constitution, particularly the equality and the rights of minority groups to develop their culture and use their language. Latvia Latvian Constitutional Court, Judgement of 23 April 2019, Case no. 2018-12-01 aka Language of Education II (Izglītības ieguves valoda II: LR Satversmes tiesas spriedums lietā nr.2018-12-01. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 2019. 24. aprīlis, nr. 81)
2019-04-23 Kiryl Kascian View
CUREDI007LV005 Whether the increase in the proportion of instruction hours in the official language in Latvia complies with the Constitution and international human rights laws, particularly the principle of equality and the rights of minority individuals to preserve and use their culture and language Latvia Latvian Constitutional, Judgement of 13 May 2005, Case no. 2004-18-0106 (Mazākumtautību skolas: LR Satversmes tiesas spriedums lietā nr.2004-18-0106. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 2005. 17. maijs, nr. 77 (2019/232.8))
2005-05-13 Kiryl Kascian View
CUREDI002FR012 Whether the prohibition for a mother to expose her children to the members of Raëlism, the religious movement she adheres to, violates Articles 8, 9, 10, 11, both alone and in combination with Article 14 of the ECHR. France F.L. v. France, App. no. 61162/00, 03 November 2005
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1103DEC006116200
2005-11-03 Alice Margaria View
CUREDI005CH001 Whether a private Islamic kindergarten complies with the aims of the public elementary school. Switzerland Federal Supreme Court, Judgement of 18 October 2016, BGer 2C_807/2015 (Urteil 2C_807/2015 vom 18. Oktober 2016)
2016-10-18 Saskia Thomi; Burim Ramaj View
CUREDI043BE006 1) Whether a public-authority school can expand a ban on wearing religious signs based on its neutrality policy to apply to religious education teachers (when they are outside their classrooms), or whether the school must provide an exception for this particular category. 2) Whether the constitution places limits on the neutrality principle as it applies to state schools, given that the constitution also requires these schools to offer a wide range of religious courses taught by a special category of teachers who must be able to credibly represent their religion in their position at these public-authority schools. Belgium Council of State, Judgment of 01 February 2016, No. 233.672 (Conseil d’Etat, arrêt du 1 février 2016, n° 233.672)
no ECLI
2016-02-01 Adriaan Overbeeke View
CUREDI043BE004 Whether an Orthodox Jewish school may refuse to enrol children whose Orthodox Jewish parents agree with the school’s pedagogical project and regulations but hold political views regarding Israel that are unacceptable to the majority in the school’s Orthodox community. Belgium Court of Appeal Antwerp, Judgment of 18 June 2013, no. 2012/AR/2910 (Hof van Beroep Antwerpen, 18 juni 2013, nr. 2012/AR/2910)
2013-06-18 Adriaan Overbeeke View
CUREDI100ES001 Whether the administration can justify not providing Islamic religious education in a state-funded school due to a lack of qualified teachers to provide such education. Spain High Court of Justice Valencia, Judgment of 24 January 2023, no. 25/2023 (Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Valencia, Sentencia de 24 de enero 2023, Sentencia número 25/2023)
ECLI:ES:TSJCV:2023:700
2023-01-24 David Katz Rotnitzky View
CUREDI100ES002 Whether a mother’s decision to baptise her four-year-old daughter interferes with the father’s right to educate his children according to his own convictions and with the child’s freedom of religion. Spain Provincial Court Granada, Order of 6 April 2022, no. 28/2022 (Audiencia Provincial de Granada, Auto de 06 de abril 2022, Auto número 28/2022)
ECLI:ES:APGR:2022:447A
2022-04-06 David Katz Rotnitzky View
CUREDI100ES003 Whether the inaction of the administration in response to a request for students to receive Islamic religious education at public schools is lawful. Spain High Court of Justice Murcia, Judgment of 8 February 2022, no. 41/2022 (Tribunal Superior de Justicia Murcia, Sentencia de 08 de febrero 2022, Sentencia número 41/2022)
ECLI:ES:TSJMU:2022:50
2022-02-08 David Katz Rotnitzky View
CUREDI100ES004 Whether the administration of a public school protected the right of parents to request that their children receive Islamic religious education. Spain High Court of Justice La Rioja, Judgment of 23 February 2017, no. 63/2017 (Tribunal Superior de Justicia La Rioja, Sentencia de 23 de febrero de 2017, Sentencia número 63/2017)
ECLI:ES:TSJLR:2017:133
2017-02-23 David Katz Rotnitzky View
CUREDI100ES005 Whether it was lawful for the administration to refuse to provide Islamic religious education to the appellant’s children in a public school. Spain High Court of Justice La Rioja, Judgment of 2 November 2017, no. 322/2017 (Tribunal Superior de Justicia La Rioja, Sentencia de 2 de noviembre de 2017, Sentencia número 322/2017)
ECLI:ES:TSJLR:2017:476
2017-11-02 David Katz Rotnitzky View
CUREDI100ES006 Whether the administration did enough to guarantee the defendant’s right to have her children receive Islamic religious education. Spain High Court of Justice Granada, Judgment of 21 October 2022, no. 4399/2022 (Tribunal Superior de Justicia Granada, Sentencia de 21 de octubre de 2022, Sentencia número 4399/2022)
ECLI:ES:TSJAND:2022:12266
2022-10-21 David Katz Rotnitzky View
CUREDI100ES007 Whether the transfer of a student wearing the hijab to another school is in the best interests of the child or infringed on the student’s freedom of religion. Spain Contentious-Administrative Court No. 1 Guadalajara, Judgement of 31 March 2023, No. 54/2023 (Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo Nº 1 Guadalajara, Sentencia de 31 de marzo de 2023, Sentencia núm. 54/2023)
2023-03-31 David Katz Rotnitzky View
CUREDI100ES008 1) Whether the display of crucifixes in a public school is contrary to neutrality. 2) Whether the public authorities are responsible for the removal of crucifixes in public schools. Spain High Court of Justice Madrid, Judgment of 15 October 2002, no. 1105/2002 (Tribunal Superior de Justicia Madrid, Sentencia de 15 de octubre de 2002, Sentencia número 1105/2002)
ECLI:ES:TSJM:2002:13636
2002-10-15 David Katz Rotnitzky View
CUREDI100ES009 Whether the enrolment of a child from an agnostic family in a state-funded Catholic school infringes on the right of parents to give their children a moral and religious education in accordance with their own convictions. Spain High Court of Justice Aragon, Judgment of 17 February 2017, no. 60/2017 (Tribunal Superior de Justicia Aragón, Sentencia de 17 de febrero de 2017, Sentencia número 60/2017)
ECLI:ES:TSJAR:2017:150
2017-02-17 David Katz Rotnitzky View
CUREDI101TR010 Whether the Turkish authorities’ enforcement of a school dress code, and the resulting restriction on the applicants’ access to education arising from the ban on Islamic headscarves, violated the applicants’ rights under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Turkey Köse and Others v. Turkey, App. no. 26625/02, 24 January 2006
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0124DEC002662502
2006-01-24 Ahmet Said Aydil View
CUREDI018PT016 Whether the early school leaving of a 14-year-old Roma/Gypsy girl, justified by Roma/Gypsy traditions, should be legally considered a case of child endangerment warranting state intervention. Portugal Court of Appeal Lisbon, Judgment of 20 March 2012, 783/11.2TBBRR.L1-1 (Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, Acórdão de 20 de março de 2012, Processo n.º 783/11.2TBBRR.L1-1)
ECLI:PT:TRL:2012:783.11.2TBBRR.L1.1.AE
2012-03-20 Mariana Monteiro de Matos View
CUREDI101TR013 1) Whether a ban on wearing the Islamic headscarf at universities constitutes a justified interference with the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and whether such a restriction can be deemed necessary in a democratic society for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others and the maintenance of public order, laiklik (secularism), and gender equality. 2) Whether a university rector’s circular (genelge) satisfies the requirement that restrictions on rights be prescribed by law. Turkey Leyla Şahin v. Turkey, App. no. 44774/98, 10 November 2005
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1110JUD004477498
2005-11-10 Ahmet Said Aydil View
CUREDI091PT004 Whether placement in a foster home is a proportionate measure to remedy school absenteeism among Roma children. Portugal Court of Appeal Évora, Judgment of 9 September 2021, Proc. No. 1674/18.1T8TMR.E1 (Tribunal da Relação de Évora, Acórdão de 9 de setembro de 2021, Processo n.º 1674/18.1T8TMR.E1)
ECLI:PT:TRE:2021:1674.18.1T8TMR.E1.EB
2021-09-09 Patrícia Jerónimo View
CUREDI101TR007 Whether a ban on a university professor wearing the Islamic headscarf while performing her professional duties, and her being deemed to have resigned for continuing to wear it, violated her freedom of religion and constituted discrimination. Turkey Kurtulmuş v. Turkey, App. no. 65500/01, 24 January 2006
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0124DEC006550001
2006-01-24 Ahmet Said Aydil View

New search Refine search